OK, the holiday weekend is over, a (slight) chance to relax was had, and now it’s time to take a retrospective look back at the 2007-2008 season from the point of view of an on stage musician.
Overall, my major impression from the season is that I had to learn quite a bit of unfamiliar music. Not only music that I’d never heard before:
Dvorak Variations for Orchestra
MacMillan The Confessions of Isobel Gowdie
Berio Folk Songs
Sibelius Symphony No. 6
Barber Souvenirs
Sibelius En Saga
Martinu The Frescoes of Piero della Francesca
Messiaen L’Ascension
But there were many pieces that I knew well as a listener, but had never learned for performance before:
Bartok Music for Strings, Percussion and Celesta
Bartok Miraculous Mandarin (complete)
Elgar In the South “Alassio”
Liszt Piano Concerto No. 2
Bizet Symphony No 1 in C
Stravinsky Violin Concerto
And if this much of the season was unfamiliar to me – how must it have felt to the audiences? Looking at the audience figures for some of these concerts, it seems that there were some people that simply stayed away from the Classical series. I’m not sure how much of a factor programming was in their decision to stay away, but it might have played a part.
Many of the programs looked terrific on paper – you could see intellectually why certain pieces would go together – but ultimately, many of them did not coalesce into something more than the sum of their individual parts. And there were some missed opportunities. Such as Classical 11, which featured the J.C. Bach Sinfonia for Double Orchestra, and Classical 12 which featured Bartok’s Music for Strings, Percussion and Celesta. Both pieces feature a two-part divided string orchestra, and they would have been a natural pairing, yet they were split onto separate programs. Why? I’m not sure, and that was a major missed opportunity to point up the divided orchestra feature of both works, and how they were used differently. That would have been an informative and elegant use for the conductor’s remarks at the top of the concert, and in the program notes.
There was, in my opinion, one concert of the entire series which was a home run. That would have been Classical 12, which featured the Bartok Music for Strings, Percussion and Celesta, Sharon Kam playing the Mozart Clarinet Concerto, and the Suite from Strauss’ Der Rosenkavalier. It was a varied program that featured one relatively unfamiliar work (Bartok), a great soloist in core repertoire (Mozart), and a beloved operatic distillation that featured virtuoso writing for the whole orchestra.
The last concert of the season was bothersome for me, because though I liked the concept of going from Heaven to Earth in the programming, the poor Messiaen never had a chance with the audience because it wasn’t given any context in which to thrive. I know it was probably a matter of rehearsal time and budget for players, but if we’d been able to do any sort of short French impressionist work as a prelude to the Messiaen, it would have given the audience a toe-hold into the extension of that musical language that Messiaen lived in, and enabled a more visceral appreciation of L’Ascension. A missed opportunity.
Similarly, the opening concert of the season had the appropriate ingredient of a great showpiece for a great soloist (Rach 2 w/ Valentina Lisitsa), but opened with a not-so-great piece (Dvorak Orch Variations) that was obscure to boot, and then ended with one of the great openers of the repertoire (Zarathustra) that also happens to have one of the weakest endings in the literature. Why not have started with the Strauss, had intermission, then done a shorter work and ended with the Rachmaninoff, a great curtain closer if there ever was one.
My final quibble is with doing complete versions of stage works – in this case, Miraculous Mandarin, The Three-Cornered Hat, and A Midsummer Night’s Dream. Why? Though there might be a case for the Bartók, there are still stretches (much longer in the other three works) that just don’t work well without the action they’re supposed to accompany, especially in the De Falla. I don’t think that we gain as much as we expend in rehearsal time and audience goodwill by doing complete works just for the sake of having done them. There are excellent suites of each of these pieces which provide the high points, and they were distilled for good reason: audiences love them.
My final peeve: Inside the Score. Didn’t anyone go over the scripts (if they even existed) for these things before they were done?). You don’t need a big budget to do this well (look at the Bernstein Young People’s concerts or his Norton lectures), you just need a well-written, well-vetted script with clear logic and a very clear theme. More work in advance pays off at the concert. Winging it isn’t acceptable.
The good news: the season was ultimately successful, regardless of what I think, and next season looks to be even better integrated and planned out than the last, and should be more successful still.
14 replies on “2007-2008 season – a look back”
Hi Charles, since this past season I did 3 of the 4 IS concerts I felt like adding a comment about the “script issue”. I own several English dictionaries (Oxford Advanced Learner’s; American Cultural Dictionary; Slangs Dic, etc.) but none of them gave me anything for the expression “winging”. Could you explain what you mean by that? What have I done??? 🙂
I agree that I am on the “lighter side” of the Bernstein-like lecture type entertainment. It seems to attract and entertain a particular kind (neither POPS nor Classical subsciber!) of audience though! (The IS concerts nevertheless sold really well…) Anyway, I am all for “more, deeper and better” when it comes to music, music education and concerts in general. All suggestions are welcome and will be taken seriously!
Next season however I am doing only one of the four IS performances so I won’t have a lot of influence on what is going to happen.
I’ll do my best with Schubert’s Unfinished in January! Take my word for that!
See you at Viola Burnout in a couple of days!
Best
Gregory
Hi Gregory – thanks for taking the time to comment! A couple of points:
Even though you did 3 out of 4 IS concerts this season, I have the same complaint about pretty much every one of them from previous seasons as well, so I’m not laying it all at your feet (yet :-D). In fact, I think that in many ways, you do a great job, I’d just like to see it go a bit further. The orchestra plays relaxed and very well for you, and that (as another reader mentioned to me in an email) is as much of a draw as the talking. I just think that after a while, the pieces that one can do will cycle themselves out, and then you’ve got to mine them for deeper nuggets, not just relying on a good performance to smooth over whatever might be lacking. As for “winging” it, it means flying by the seat of one’s pants (or seeming to) rather than following a script, and while I think my remark was a bit unfair (and I apologize for that) I do believe that a well-written script (and I’m not criticizing your English, it’s certainly better than my German!) which is timed out and has carefully placed (and timed) examples can make these concerts even more rewarding for the audiences. And that’s what I’m after, ultimately, as I know you are.
I think a beer or two is now in order!
Beer sounds good, just bring back the sunny days, please!
Just to wrap up our little conversation here:
1. I put many hours of background work in my “seemingly flying by the seat of one’s pant” performances
2. I don’t think that calling my English better than your German will make me happy… I have no idea though how your German is.
3. Mining for deeper nuggets I think is the next step anyway for the IS series. (But, please don’t go “Nerve Endings” if you listen to me!)
4. Your remark was not unfair just perhaps a little short.
5. Thanks for the compliments. I’ll pick up the tab for the beers! 🙂
4.
As a member of the paparazzi, I am interested in the Viola Burnout — especially if it is of Burning Man caliber.
And let’s take some Hungarian lessons from GV!
Just to be clear, no violas will be harmed at the Viola Burnout, but there may be an injured violist afterwards!
As for Gregory’s follow-up comment, I have a lot of respect for what he’s done with the orchestra this year, and any nit-picking I do here on the blog is just that: nit-picking. I’ve written an email privately to him about it, and I’m looking forward to working with him (even if much less with the OSO next year due to schedule constraints, but maybe possibly some chamber music?) next season.
I only hope we can keep him around for a couple more seasons before he hits the music director jackpot!
We are on the same page here! There’s no way to write blogs without nit-picking anyway.
I am giving cheap Hungarian lessons over the internet!
Sorry Everybody, I should have put a 🙂 after my comment of my English vs. Charles’s German. It was meant to be a sarcastic joke!
[…] opened my in box yesterday to find the following response to my post about the 2007-2008 season from OSO music director Carlos Kalmar. He has allowed me to print it in it’s entirety. I […]
As a regular symphony goer, I’d like to extend a thanks to everyone involved with this past season. Some highlights for me:
Confessions of Isobel Gowdie: Wow. I had never heard this piece before, and was absolutely thunderstruck by it. I love it when a piece I have never even heard of immediately rockets to the top of my musical consciousness and stays there for days afterward.
Van Cliburn: Vanka can still pack ’em in. It was an honor to hear the grand old man do what he’s most famous for, even if his chops have slipped a bit over the years.
Bartok Music for Strings/Celesta: It’s great fun going to a concert to hear a beloved chestnut (Mozart) and then I end up enjoying a brand new (to me) piece even more than the one I went to hear.
Carmina Burana: I appreciate your critique of this work Charles; it isn’t especially complex or deep. But there are some astonishingly beautiful melodies scattered throughout, and boy the audiences sure eat it up! It was great fun (as always) to sing with the OSO.
Thanks again all, and I can’t wait for next year.
Lorin – thanks for your comments – I wish we’d get more patrons responding to concert programs and performances – maybe the symphony could have such a capability on their website? (thanks to an email suggestion for that one) Could be fun to have a sense of community ownership on the symphony’s own website, don’t you think?
Glad you loved the MacMillan, it was a lot of work, and I’m happy that people ‘got’ it. Cliburn is always fun, a living legend. I hope we have a chance to do the Bartok again, maybe on an IS concert, it would be great to get another chance at it, and I think audiences would love to delve into its mysteries. Carmina – always a crowd pleaser, and there’s nothing wrong with that, especially when the houses are over 90% sold like they were for the whole run this year! And thank you for the great performances of the Portland Symphonic Choir – the improvements over the last few years have been amazing and haven’t gone unnoticed by us in the orchestra!
What does a “sense of community” mean on the Symphony’s website? Eveybody gets to become a critic? Praise and slam according to one’s own tastes? It’s been tried before – here and there – and all it takes is some well intended or not so well intended commentator to tell everyone to stay away, or to do this or do that….if every business in American thought that it was cool to give their customer base an opportunity to lay it all out for everyone else to see, everyone would be doing it. Why do you think the Jacksonville Musicians Assoc. banned posters from their web site after the turmoil there? Because kooks and others tried to push an agenda. It was idiotic chaos.
So is the answer asking the Symphony to assign a full time person to moderate the hundreds of comments – and inevitably becoming a censor, deleting the comments that will turn away ticket sales and donors, and hyping the unpopular pieces as “must hear” events?
I don’t see what your suggestions would accomplish in this unpatrolled world of say what you want, post it, and it is so.
PS Your unintended slams of Vajda and his work were insensitive and unfortunate. He handled it with aplomb. Just think if every member of the Symphony had a blog and diddled away on every issue that they desired to broadcast to the world on…Carlos et al would be spending 24/7 justifying their every breathing moment. Yet they don’t blog away when y’all play out of tune of hit a clam or three…..
“Therkel”, I suspect that you’ll be disappointed to learn that the orchestra may very well implement what you dislike so much. I think that there is a way to have it done well, and if it doesn’t work, I’m sure that it’s just as easy to turn off the spigot as it is to turn it on. In the next couple years, every corporation in America WILL be doing it, the fact that they’re not doing so at this point just means that they don’t know how to capitalize on or monetize it.
I really do resent the tone that you present, whether you mean it or not, that I’m some uninformed yahoo who has nothing better to do with their time and talent than blather away on some narcissistic blogging project. I actually DO have some expertise in the areas in which I write, and I think I’ve earned the right, after 12 seasons as a professional musician in a major orchestra, four years of undergrad at a liberal arts college, a master’s degree, and a post-graduate degree at a top conservatory, to share my opinions on what I think works and what I think does not.
By the way, Gregory Vajda and I are on great terms, we have great mutual respect for each other, and I saw him tonight and it was a relaxed and happy exchange we had. I’m sure he appreciates your support, but we’re both adults, and we’re going on our way in friendship.
I might not have stated things in the best possible way, but at least I was honest, and gave a straightforward opinion, which usually is something for which one earns props, not haughty admonitions from people who won’t even risk giving their real or entire name.
You’re the only person I’ve run across that’s ever had anything negative to say about what I do here (on my own time and money), either in person or online. You must not have read any of my hundreds of previous posts (or should I say “diddles”), some of which were very candid as to my passion for the orchestra I play in, the music I play, and my deep respect for the people with whom I work and work for.
I’m sorry that you cannot appreciate that.
Finally, if my employers have a problem with what I blog about, I expect that I’ll hear from them, and I’ll respect their wishes. Until then, I’ll make a good faith effort to offer my observations about the arts in Portland and anywhere else, which seems to be working for most everyone else.
Excellent! Just wanted to challenge you a bit, as you say in your own words, nobody else does. That’s rather telling right there, don’t you think?
[…] Zach Carstensen Charles Noble, the assistant principal violist with the Oregon Symphony posted a nice, critical review of their season which ended last week. His observations sparked a thorough debate on the season and […]