In case you’ve missed it in your day’s rounds of the internet, Jon Kimura Parker, soloist with the orchestra last week in the Brahms d minor piano concerto, responded to David Stabler’s review (a markedly negative one) of the performance:
We live in a fascinating time where reviewers cannot hide behind their newspapers as in days past, and where online reactions cover a wide gamut. From my perspective as the solo pianist in question, I would like to reassure everyone that while I do often read my reviews, good or bad, I try not to take them too personally or too seriously. I appreciate Mr. Stabler’s being true to his opinion: the last time I played in Portland for PPI, he gave me an extraordinarily generous and enthusiastic review. If I enjoyed that review when it came out (which I did,) I can hardly turn around now and say that I don’t respect his opinion! In fact, he was clear in this review that while he usually likes my playing, he was baffled this time around. All of this is fair game for a reviewer and I am not in the least offended.
However there is a big difference between how I have been reviewed and how the Oregon Symphony is reviewed. Once I leave town (and in fact I’m already in rehearsals for the Beijing Music Festival) any review of my performance loses relevance quickly. It is different for Maestro Kalmar and the Oregon Symphony, who depend on ticket purchases and the collective goodwill of the Portland community on an ongoing basis. If there is a pattern of negative reviews, it is theoretically possible that this could affect the health of the symphony. Any sensitive reviewer knows this, and we have to appreciate that this puts Mr. Stabler in a difficult position: if he really takes artistic issue with concerts for weeks on end, how honest should he be to his opinion; how harsh should he be in print? A truly impartial reviewer cannot act simply as free PR. How do you balance being a cheerleader on one end, and a finicky critic on the other? He certainly has the option to exercise discretion and express appreciation for all that the Oregon Symphony is. While Mr. Stabler didn’t choose this approach this time, I am sure that he has on others. There is no question that he must be aware of the artistic and educational impact of the Oregon Symphony on the Portland community.
Around the country, musicians refer to Portland affectionately as “a real piano town.” I would go further to say that Portlanders are passionate and knowledgeable about all classical music. (And many other kinds of music as well – I’m a Pink Martini fan myself.) As a visiting performer I know that many in the audience will either have deep appreciation for Brahms, or specific knowledge of the First Piano Concerto. How wonderful it is to perform in such a welcoming and sophisticated environment! In the very long opening movement of the Brahms, I was aware on all three nights of the total commitment of the audience. Believe me, to most performers, that silence during a performance means much more than the amount of applause afterwards.
How appropriate that the Oregon Symphony chose to perform in memory of stage manager Bob McClung with deeply meaningful music on opening night… I don’t think it occurred to anyone at the Symphony that such a tribute would dampen the effect of the “opening night” vibe; the tribute simply had to be made. Granted, it made for a very long first half, but backstage we all felt good about the gesture. Also, while I’m not always a big fan of long speeches prior to performances (despite occasionally giving them myself) I was touched that Executive Director Elaine Calder made the public gesture of making each purchased ticket go as far as possible in bringing more people to hear the Oregon Symphony.
I would like to say this about the Oregon Symphony from the perspective of a musician who performed with them in the 90s under the esteemed direction of James dePreist, and then not for several years. As wonderful as they were then, they have grown enormously. Their sense of sound, their sense of phrasing, their sense of ensemble, of style, of finesse: for me it is like not seeing someone for several years and being surprised at how much they have changed and grown. I first worked with Carlos Kalmar 20 years ago in Frankfurt, and then not again until this past June in Grant Park. He challenges his musicians in every rehearsal and inspires them with ideas. He has a palpable intensity. There will be hiccups and growth spurts, but I am impressed with the direction these players are going.
In Monday night’s performance, in a moment in the slow movement where I am accompanying the oboes, I glanced in Maestro Kalmar’s direction, which put the cello section in my field of view. They weren’t playing at that moment, and easily could have been just counting bars until their next entry. Instead, Principal Cellist Nancy Ives and Assistant Principal Marilyn deOliveira were listening to the music in what I could only call a state of rapture. What a privilege it is to perform with conductors and musicians who play with this kind of involvement with their art.
Jon Kimura Parker
4 replies on “kimura parker responds to review of symphony”
Mr. Parker is not only a fine pianist but a fine and thoughtful writer as well. That was a nice endorsement of the orchestra’s progress. Thanks for posting that, Charles.
What an extraordinary, graceful, generous posting! Thanks to Mr. Parker for taking the trouble to write it, and to Charles for alerting us to it. As a longtime critic (a term I fought like the blazes, but which I guess was apt; “guy who opens cultural conversations” doesn’t fit very well beneath a byline) I’m well aware of that feeling of being the only person in the room who doesn’t like something — and sometimes, of being the only person in the room who DOES like something. I worked with David Stabler for years and have always found him to be open, honest and well-informed. Gently funny, too. I know he doesn’t lower the boom without genuinely feeling it needs to be lowered. Newspaper reviewers are in a constant struggle between speaking for themselves, for their readers, for the institutions, and for the art form. You can’t balance all of those things in any single review. That’s why we read reviewers over the long haul: Each review is a chapter in a longer narrative, and you need that larger picture to understand the critic’s way of looking at things. No newspaper critic I know of, in any discipline, hasn’t pulled his or her punches on occasion to “protect” an important institution he or she believed was in a vulnerable situation. (A few will deny they’ve ever done it. I doubt their word.) I have. And every time, I’ve felt a little dirty afterwards, like being untrue to what I really thought was being untrue to every other part of the task as well. You can argue that a negative review says more about the reviewer than the performance; that the reviewer, in the words of “The Music Man,” simply didn’t know the territory. Sometimes that’s true. Not in David’s case, though: What happened here was a simple and honest difference of opinion. And what a good thing, if you stop to think about it, that so many people care enough to be upset about it.
One day all of us, David Stabler included, will remember these years with Carlos Kalmar as the golden years. We are blessed to have such a fine conductor. The members of the orchestra complete a team that will not be surpassed for many years. All of them have worked hard to achieve this level. I just left the October 19th performance of the three B’s and walked home from the street car stop. The night could not have been more magical.
“B” Music 19 October 2009
Watching the orchestra physically push themselves in unison as one body was not unlike watching the butterfly effect of wind surfers as they catch the wind while “playing” on the Columbia River. Each orchestral section had their turn and took their place in the fluid movements of the music…not only playing but caught up in the wind of the magnificent scores of Brahms, Bernstein and Beethoven. Bravo! Maestro Kalmar for stunning your audience with gentle breezes and gale storms. It was quite a ride! Bravo!!